Marko Kreen escribió:
> On 3/30/07, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> >In any case it's not likely that there are going to be thousands of
> >prepared statements, so is this really an issue?
> I think the issue is here that its very common thing to do,
> so open-coding it everywhere is waste, there should be some
> utility function for that.
> void hash_foreach(HTAB, void (*cb_func)(void *));

Extra points if you can implement a map() function for hashes ;-) (I
think it's called "mutator" in our sources for other kind of stuff)

I think it would be
void *hash_map(HTAB, void *(*map_func) (void *))

Not sure what the return value would be though :-( (Maybe this is
extra complication enough that it's not worth the hassle)

Alvaro Herrera                      
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at


Reply via email to