Marko Kreen escribió: > On 3/30/07, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >In any case it's not likely that there are going to be thousands of > >prepared statements, so is this really an issue? > > I think the issue is here that its very common thing to do, > so open-coding it everywhere is waste, there should be some > utility function for that. > > void hash_foreach(HTAB, void (*cb_func)(void *)); Extra points if you can implement a map() function for hashes ;-) (I think it's called "mutator" in our sources for other kind of stuff) I think it would be void *hash_map(HTAB, void *(*map_func) (void *)) Not sure what the return value would be though :-( (Maybe this is extra complication enough that it's not worth the hassle) -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
