Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches > > It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews > and approves it. >
So, hum, what happened to the idea of creating the array types only on demand? > > > David Fetter wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 05:08:42PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > > David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > After several rounds of patches, it appears that it might be easier to > > > > create a new typtype entry, which I'll tentatively call 'a' because it > > > > seems a little fragile and a lot inelegant and hard to maintain to > > > > have typtype='c' and typrelid=InvalidOid mean, "this is an array of > > > > complex types." > > > > > > Uh, wouldn't it be typtype = 'c' and typelem != 0 ? > > > > Right. The attached patch passes the current regression tests and at > > least to a "smoke test" level does what it's supposed to do. I'd > > really like to help refactor the whole array system to use 'a', tho. > > > > Cheers, -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
