Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wonder if it wouldn't be better to clean this up by creating a
> separate typedef for segment numbers, with its own special values?

Probably.  I remember having thought about it when I put in the
FORGET_DATABASE_FSYNC hack.  I think I didn't do it because I needed
to backpatch and so I wanted a minimal-size patch.  Feel free to do it
in HEAD ...

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to