Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> That doesn't mean this one isn't useful.  Please revert this.

> Well, Tom and I thought it caused confusion, as did the person reporting
> the confusion.  You saying to revert it isn't enough.

A possible compromise is to describe or show the syntax in some informal
form, so that it didn't look like one of the <synopsis> sections we use
for supported syntax.  I'm not sure what that would look like exactly,
but I do see merit in both sides of this discussion...

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not

Reply via email to