Added to TODO:

        o Allow single-byte header storage for arrays


Tom Lane wrote:
> Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Forgot to mention: one of the revisions was to not add the "sizes.sql"
> >> test, because the output was platform-dependent and is likely to get
> >> more so if any ability to change the toast thresholds gets put in.
> >> Can we improve that test to not expose any platform-dependent numbers?
> > I had imagined that we would have two versions of output files. Other than
> > 32-bit versus 64-bit what other platform-dependent variations enter into it?
> If there'd be only two then I'd be all right with it, but I'm worried
> that making TOAST thresholds configurable would result in lots more
> possible outputs than that.
> BTW, another area that should be kept on the TODO list is to see whether
> it makes sense to support 1-byte-header format for array elements.
> I looked at that briefly while reviewing the patch but decided it was a
> large additional chunk of work and not on the critical path.
>                       regards, tom lane
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

  Bruce Momjian  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to