Andrew Dunstan wrote: > I don't think it should go away until we provide for equivalents in > core, at least optionally.
Well, if we're going to make libxslt an explicit thing, then it'd be trivial to add an xslt transformation function into the core, and then I think we can claim equivalent support. But we'll have to check the details, of course. I have been thinking, however, that I don't want to add more and more library dependencies into the server. libxml2 was necessary to some extent. But xslt functionality could easily be provided as a module. This would be easy to do and might be useful even for 8.3. But I don't really know how to label that. Having a contrib/xslt alongside contrib/xml2 would probably be confusing. Ideas? -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
