Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I've tinkered with this patch a bit.  Sample output:
> 
> > LOG:  automatic vacuum of table "alvherre.public.foo": index scans: 0
> >         pages: removed 0, 11226 remain
> >         tuples: 1300683 removed, 1096236 remain
> >         system usage: CPU 0.29s/0.38u sec elapsed 2.56 sec
> 
> Please be a bit more consistent about whether numbers precede or follow
> their descriptions.  "x removed, y remain" might work.

Fixed.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to