Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Or we could switch to a more compact representation of the dead tuples, > and not need such a big maintenance_work_mem in the first place.
Hm, you got any ideas? One constraint is that it doesn't seem acceptable to make the search function any slower. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster