Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Or we could switch to a more compact representation of the dead tuples, 
> and not need such a big maintenance_work_mem in the first place.

Hm, you got any ideas?  One constraint is that it doesn't seem
acceptable to make the search function any slower.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to