I'm not interested in pushing for inclusion, this is
just an observation.

On 05/16/2007 03:20:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

This seems rather pointless unless we were going to undertake to make
outfuncs.c support *all* raw-grammar node types.

Isn't having something better than having nothing?
It's not like it matters at all one way or the other
to the end-user.  It's just for the developers. (?)

Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
                 -- Robert A. Heinlein

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to