Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> ... I have resisted having VACUUM freeze >> tuples before they've reached a quite-respectable age, and I object to >> having CLUSTER do it either.
> How about freezing anything older than vacuum_freeze_min_age, just like > VACUUM does? I suppose that'd be OK, but is it likely to be worth the trouble? >> I could maybe accept a CLUSTER FREEZE option to do this, but that's not >> what's in the patch. > I wouldn't like to add more options to CLUSTER, people are already > confused about the similar VACUUM options. Agreed, I wasn't thrilled with that idea. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings