"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2007/6/11, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Why do we need this?
> For stored procedures.

No, the question is what is the patch trying to accomplish, because
as far as I can see it's wrong.  It seems to be trying to insert the
plpgsql name of the cursor, which is not necessarily the SQL name.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to