"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2007/6/11, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Why do we need this? >> > For stored procedures.
No, the question is what is the patch trying to accomplish, because as far as I can see it's wrong. It seems to be trying to insert the plpgsql name of the cursor, which is not necessarily the SQL name. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly