Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yeah, what I did was to wind back the chunk size - try 128 and you'll
> see plenty of chunked messages :-) But we really need to do this with
> installcheck-parallel to exercise it properly.
Doh, of course. I ran installcheck-parallel with log_statement = all
and the chunk size reduced to 64, and saw no apparent problems.
So that gives me at least enough confidence to apply it to HEAD.
>> (The
>> patch seems to need some adjustment to apply against 8.2, though.)
> I know we normally try not to do this, but I'd be happy to wait for the
> back branches in this case.
[confused...] How do you envision proceeding exactly?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
