Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Attached is a patch which moves the messages to ProcSleep().

BTW, with the messages moved out of the ISR it would be safe to make it
identify the specific lock being waited on (in the same terms used in
the existing deadlock messages).  Is there a reason not to do that?
I suppose it would eat a few more cycles ...

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not

Reply via email to