Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> (Note that COPY per se will not trigger this behavior anyway, since it
>> will act in a limited number of buffers because of the recent buffer
>> access strategy patch.)

> Actually we dropped it from COPY, because it didn't seem to improve 
> performance in the tests we ran.

Who's "we"?  AFAICS, CVS HEAD will treat a large copy the same as any
other large heapscan.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to