Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> (Note that COPY per se will not trigger this behavior anyway, since it >> will act in a limited number of buffers because of the recent buffer >> access strategy patch.)
> Actually we dropped it from COPY, because it didn't seem to improve > performance in the tests we ran. Who's "we"? AFAICS, CVS HEAD will treat a large copy the same as any other large heapscan. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly