Tom Lane wrote: > It's too bad that gcc doesn't have a > -Wno-snarkiness-about-system-headers-thank-you switch.
It does have a switch to *add* snarkiness about system headers, but does not do it by default. The problem in this case is that an uncast null pointer constant is not always a sufficient sentinel for variadic functions, as explained here: <http://c-faq.com/null/null2.html>. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
