"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for reading. Updated version in new patch.

What was the reasoning for basing walwriter.c on autovacuum (which needs
to be able to execute transactions) rather than bgwriter (which does
not)?  The shutdown logic in particular seems all wrong; you can't have
a process connected to shared memory that is going to outlive the

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to