"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There is an explicit test for whether the transaction has modified > files; if so the commit is always synchronous, even if explicitly > requested otherwise. Also, utility commands never perform async commits, > so overall there aren't that many of the commonly used DDL commands that > could be performed and still have it be an async commit.
Huh? I see neither a reason for these restrictions nor any way that you could enforce them without horrid kluges. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly