Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> When complaining I hadn't read the pghackers thread in which you >> suggested this, and now that I'm caught up on email I remain >> unconvinced. What do you need convert_to_scalar for in order to display >> the pg_statistic histogram? You've already got the underlying data.
> Then the charting tool would have to duplicate all the same code that > convert_to_scalar has to figure out what to do with the data. How so? The entries in the histogram are equidistant by definition. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend