"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I don't think it's an acceptable change in either place.  People who
>>> want to see UTC in their logs can start the postmaster in UTC.  Those
>>> who are accustomed to seeing local time will squawk.
>> It would probably make sense to use UTC in the CSV logs since they're 
>> intended
>> to be machine readable. Whatever program is used to read them can handle
>> displaying the timestamps in the appropriate timezone for user's consumption.
> I don't think we really want to pay for formatting the timestamp twice
> (the existing patch goes out of its way to avoid that IIRC).

Well even if we include the time in integer seconds-since-unix-epoch format it
would be useful for a CSV data format. 

  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to