"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> I don't think it's an acceptable change in either place. People who >>> want to see UTC in their logs can start the postmaster in UTC. Those >>> who are accustomed to seeing local time will squawk. > >> It would probably make sense to use UTC in the CSV logs since they're >> intended >> to be machine readable. Whatever program is used to read them can handle >> displaying the timestamps in the appropriate timezone for user's consumption. > > I don't think we really want to pay for formatting the timestamp twice > (the existing patch goes out of its way to avoid that IIRC).
Well even if we include the time in integer seconds-since-unix-epoch format it would be useful for a CSV data format. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
