Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ... Perhaps we could redefine Reset to mean > ResetAndDeleteChildren, and add another name for the current Reset > functionality. ResetAndPreserveChildren, maybe?
Yeah, I was considering exactly that as an interim step. >> Anyone want to investigate what happens if we make MemoryContextReset >> the same as MemoryContextResetAndDeleteChildren? > Sure, I'll take a look, but I'll apply the attached patch in the mean > time (above cleanup is probably 8.4 material anyway). Probably, given that we've not noticed any major leaks from other places that might have the same problem. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster