"Florian G. Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However, none of these are very strong reasons - certainly weaker than > doing what ensures to cause the least confusion. I'm therefore > starting to think that we should remove transaction, and keep the name > virtualtransaction for the VXID. That will ensure that clients who > *do* rely on pg_locks and the "transaction" column (which will be few, > I guess) at least fail early and visibly, instead of producing bogus > results...
Barring other objections, I'll do it that way. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly