Patch applied.  Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Kris Jurka wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Parts of the GSS API want the object while others want pointers to the
> >> object and it looks like this code got it backwards.  I haven't tested
> >> these changes, but they look right to me.
> >
> > Wouldn't the code fail entirely if it was wrong in that way?
> >
> 
> Only if it was ever run.  My suspicion is that Port->gss->ctx/cred are 
> never set to anything other than GSS_C_NO_CONTEXT and GSS_C_NO_CREDENTIAL. 
> This patch also clarifies the checking we're doing on cleanup to be 
> more clear about whether these are pointers or not.
> 
> Kris Jurka
Content-Description: 

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>        subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
>        message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

Reply via email to