Patch applied. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kris Jurka wrote: > > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Parts of the GSS API want the object while others want pointers to the > >> object and it looks like this code got it backwards. I haven't tested > >> these changes, but they look right to me. > > > > Wouldn't the code fail entirely if it was wrong in that way? > > > > Only if it was ever run. My suspicion is that Port->gss->ctx/cred are > never set to anything other than GSS_C_NO_CONTEXT and GSS_C_NO_CREDENTIAL. > This patch also clarifies the checking we're doing on cleanup to be > more clear about whether these are pointers or not. > > Kris Jurka Content-Description: [ Attachment, skipping... ] > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
