Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> The attached patch is intended to ensure that chr() does not produce 
> invalidly encoded data, as recently discussed on -hackers. For UTF8, we 
> treat its argument as a Unicode code point; for all other multi-byte 
> encodings, we raise an error on any argument greater than 127. For all 
> encodings we raise an error if the argument is 0 (we don't allow null bytes 
> in text data). The ascii() function is adjusted so that it remains the 
> inverse of chr() - i.e. for UTF8 it returns the Unicode code point, and it 
> raises an error for any other multi-byte encoding if the aregument is 
> outside the ASCII range. I have tested thius inverse property across the 
> entire Unicode code point range, 0x01 .. 0x1ffff.

Hmm, is this what we had agreed?  I'm not sure I like it; if I'm using
chr() to produce characters, then the application is going to have to
worry about server_encoding in order to find the correct parameter to
pass to chr().

What I thought was the idea is that chr() always gets an Unicode code
point, and it converts the character to the server_encoding.  If the
character cannot be converted, then it raises an error.


-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

                http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Reply via email to