Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> "ITAGAKI Takahiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > All of filler fields in branches, tellers and history is NULL. It is
> > probabbly a mistake because there are fields of char(22-88) in the table
> > definitions.
> > TPC-B requires at least 100 bytes per row for all tables used in it.
> I'm not in favor of changing this.  pgbench has never pretended to be
> "really" TPC-B, nor has anyone ever tried to compare its numbers against
> other TPC-B numbers.  On the other hand, people *do* compare pgbench
> numbers to itself over time, and if we make a change like this it will
> break comparability of the results.

Ok, I feel it reasonable.
The attached is a patch to mention it in the source code.

ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment: pgbench-tpcb.patch
Description: Binary data

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to