Tom Lane wrote: > Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> So don't initialize a local variable unless >>> you're giving it an actually meaningful value. > >> The downside is that we see a useless warning that, if sufficiently >> multiplied, might make it hard to see something we are interested in. > > [ looks again... ] Actually, I think you just proved my point for me. > The ZeroMemory call should go away, no? (Does this mean that the > Windows builds fail to detect dereferencing NULL? Bad if so.)
Windows builds don't fail to detect that in genereal. ZeroMemory, however, has a protection specifically against being passed NULL input, IIRC. //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly