> I think a prefix of ':' would be good, as it's already a 
> standard, kinda.  Anybody who names a database object :foo 
> deserves whatever happens to them :P

I for one like something less cryptic than ':'
besids going with ':' means extra hack in gram.y

(Ones we get to implement packages I prefer to have "this.arg" and
"global.arg" than ':' and '::'
but I guess that's another discussion.)


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to