"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's an updated version of the patch. There was a bogus assertion in
> the previous one, comparing against mdsync_cycle_ctr instead of
> mdunlink_cycle_ctr.

Applied with minor corrections.

I'm not sure whether we should consider back-patching this.  Thoughts?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at


Reply via email to