"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's an updated version of the patch. There was a bogus assertion in
> the previous one, comparing against mdsync_cycle_ctr instead of
> mdunlink_cycle_ctr.
Applied with minor corrections.
I'm not sure whether we should consider back-patching this. Thoughts?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
