On 11/16/07, Alex Vinokur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to use both hashlittle() and hashword() (or
> hashword_little) on little-endian and big-endian machine and to get
> identical hashValues.

Whats wrong with hashlittle()?  It does use the same optimized
reading on LE platform that hashword() does.  Or you could wrap
the read values with some int2le() macro that is NOP on LE cpu.
Although I suspect the performance wont be better than using
hashlittle() directly.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to