Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I just modified the interactions in sinval.c and sinvaladt.c per
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.patches/18820/focus=18822
>
> It looks a lot saner this way: the code that actually deals with the
> queue, including locking etc, is all in sinvaladt.c. This means that
> the struct definition of the queue, and the queue pointer, are now
> internal "implementation details" inside sinvaladt.c.
>
> One side effect of this change is that the call to SendPostmasterSignal
> now occurs after the lock has been released. ISTM this is a good idea
> on general principles (no syscalls in lwlocked code), but I'm wondering
> if I created a thundering hoard problem that did not exist before.
>
> All tests pass.
>
> As a test of Review Board, I uploaded the patch to it:
> http://reviewdemo.postgresql.org/r/19/
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
--
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your Subscription:
http://mail.postgresql.org/mj/mj_wwwusr?domain=postgresql.org&extra=pgsql-patches
