"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oh no, I didn't suggest keeping the variables as strings, that's > madness. I suggested keeping the variables as enums, and defining > "setter" functions for them, similar to the assign hooks we have now, > but the setter function wouldn't have to do anything else than assign an > int to the enum variable. The setter function would be just a > replacement for "*((int *)variable) = X".
Oh, I misunderstood. That would work, though you'd *also* need a fetch function. Having to have two extra hook functions for every variable seems like a lot of notational overhead for not much gain. (In my experience C compilers are pretty darn lax about enums anyway, and so there's not that much "strong typing" benefit to be gained from declaring the variables as enums rather than int.) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://mail.postgresql.org/mj/mj_wwwusr?domain=postgresql.org&extra=pgsql-patches