Patch rejected. Sorry. Comment is: The patch of very dubious portability and I'm not even convinced that it'd provide a net performance improvement.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marko Kreen wrote: > Attached patch moves decision how much more room to allocate > from callers of appendStringInfoVA to inside the function, > where more info is available. > > On systems with broken vsnprintf() it falls back > to doubleing the buffer. > > Fixme: the +1 could be something larger? Aligned? > > -- > marko [ Attachment, skipping... ] > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
