Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 08:24 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
As Greg mentions on another thread, not all patches are *intended* to be
production quality by their authors. Many patches are shared for the
purpose of eliciting general feedback. You yourself encourage a group
development approach and specifically punish those people dropping
completely "finished" code into the queue and expecting it to be
committed as-is.

If you post a patch that is not intended to be of production quality, it is best to mark it so explicitly. Then nobody can point fingers at you. Also, Bruce would then know not to put it in the queue of patches waiting for application.

So it can be forgotten about entirely? Hmmmm.

I think if you post something marked Work In Progress, there is an implied commitment on your part to post something complete at a later stage.

So if it's forgotten you would be the one doing the forgetting. ;-)



Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to