Volkan YAZICI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I noticed a small typo in the patch. > prev = palloc((m + n) * sizeof(char)); > line should look like > prev = palloc(2 * m * sizeof(char)); > instead.
If that's wrong, aren't the comments and the length restriction limit
also wrong?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
