"Zoltan Boszormenyi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - the int8inc(), int2_sum() and int4_sum() used pointers directly from the
> for performance, that code path is now commented out, the other code path
> is correct for the AggState and !AggState runs and correct every time and now
> because of the passbyval nature of int8, the !AggState version is not slower
> than using the pointer directly.
Does this mean count() and sum() are slower on a 32-bit machine?
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: