"Zoltan Boszormenyi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> - the int8inc(), int2_sum() and int4_sum() used pointers directly from the
> Datums
>  for performance, that code path is now commented out, the other code path
>  is correct for the AggState and !AggState runs and correct every time and now
>  because of the passbyval nature of int8, the !AggState version is not slower
>  than using the pointer directly.

Does this mean count() and sum() are slower on a 32-bit machine?

  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com
  Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL 

Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to