"Zoltan Boszormenyi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - the int8inc(), int2_sum() and int4_sum() used pointers directly from the > Datums > for performance, that code path is now commented out, the other code path > is correct for the AggState and !AggState runs and correct every time and now > because of the passbyval nature of int8, the !AggState version is not slower > than using the pointer directly.
Does this mean count() and sum() are slower on a 32-bit machine? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training! - Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
