-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:33:15 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JD seems to be on record that the existing logging mechanism sucks > and he needs something else. That's fine, but I think it means that > we need to improve logging in general, not invent a single-purpose > mechanism for logging checkpoint times. Alright hold on. That is *not* what I said. I said *in this context* an SQL interface would be nicer. I also said that I was willing to table the entire discussion based on your review of the patch in that it didn't offer what I thought it did. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH9ZVSATb/zqfZUUQRAhDJAJ49gMASDA40N9ydhzTTaMBdr/KccQCfei3d 4QXp/4C6iH7GXatqwU5qnuk= =slQS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
