Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> + __asm__ __volatile__(
> + "tas.b @%1\n\t"
> + "movt %0\n\t"
> + "xor #1,%0"
> +: "=z"(_res)
> +: "r"(lock)
> +: "t","memory");
Another question: this asm declaration ignores the advice given at lines
89-107 of s_lock.h, both cosmetic and substantive. Why? Are you
entirely certain it's right, and not subject to optimization problems in
versions of gcc other than whatever you tested?
regards, tom lane
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: