"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There's a bunch of mails in the patch queue about the indexam API, so we need
> to discuss that.
> The first question is: do we want to refactor the bitmap index scan API, if we
> don't have any immediate use for it? Namely, since we don't have anyone
> actively working on the bitmap index patch nor the git patch.
I haven't read the patch. My understanding from the discussion is that it
would allow callers of the indexam to receive a hunk of index pointers and
process them rather than have to wait for the complete index scan to finish
before processing any. Is that it?
In general I think we need to be more open to incremental improvements. I
think there are several fronts on which we refuse patches to do X because it's
useless without Y and have nobody working on Y because they would have to
solve X first.
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: