Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 4) Your problems with tsearch and timestamp etc raise an interesting problem. > We don't need to mark this in pg_control because it's a purely a run-time > issue and doesn't affect on-disk storage.
Just for the record, that's wrong. It's true that on-disk data isn't affected, but the system catalog contents are, and they'd better match what the postgres binary is going to do. > However it does affect ABI > compatibility with modules. Perhaps it should be added to > PG_MODULE_MAGIC_DATA. Very good point, especially now that it's configurable. Included in committed patch. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches