On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:49:44PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 11:29 +0100, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > This could be implemented by a "pass-through" restore_command,
> > that calls pg_standby, and does the custom action when pg_standby
> > returns successfully. 
> Yes, that's the preferred route for most cases.
> pg_standby was designed to be customisable, so if it works for
> Chris, thats OK.
> After some mulling on this, I'm not sure we need to include this in
> pg_standby however. If we did we'd end up having before/after
> commands and retry options etc.

Would those be good things to have as a whole package?

David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to