On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Jaime Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello > > > > 2008/5/1 Jaime Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Hello > > >> > > >> I found some bugs when I used base_lexer, so I returned back own > > >> lexer. It's only little bit longer, but simpler. > > >> > > > > > > you really compile this one? i get a complain because > > > read_sql_construct is called with 8 arguments and it should have only > > > 7.. > > > > yes, I did it. 8 arguments are from EXECUTE USING patch > > http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/pl/plpgsql/src/gram.y.diff?r1=1.108;r2=1.109;f=h > > > > so, i need to see that patch first? patch that doesn't apply because > of changes in files (specially definitions moved to other files, but i > haven't checked all the .rej yet) >
sorry, you mean already applied RETURN QUERY, right? i was thinking in pending patch RETURN QUERY EXECUTE... i will check again my files but i'm sure i have updated tu CVS TIP before try your patch -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte de PostgreSQL Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. (593) 087171157 -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
