On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 17:20 +0200, Bernd Helmle wrote:
> --On Donnerstag, Mai 08, 2008 14:42:50 +0100 Simon Riggs
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That makes sense. I can't see how we would make LOCAL CHECK CONSTRAINTs
> > work with rules anyhow.
> One of the idea's that came up through the discussion was to make the
> rewriter responsible for collecting check constraints such as the local
> check condition. They would be pushed down to the executor then where the
> correct constraints would be applied. However, i'm currently not in the
> position to say if this is doable right now.
That's what I was thinking too.
> The original updatable views patch tracked the state of required and
> applied rule conditions during rewrite. This way it applied only the rule
> conditions of the specified view in cascading updates.
Yes, seems like the only way we'll get LOCAL CHECK CONSTRAINTS to work.
Are you planning to work on this?
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: