I am sent two less dependend patch (both modify same files): COPY and RAISE USING. I am sorry, but I can't to know what commiters will be apply first. Problem is mainly in regress files because I append regress test on end of files. But boths are really generated from current HEAD.
Regards Pavel Stehule 2008/5/12 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I am sending enhanced version of original patch. > > Hmm ... this patch seems to have been generated against something > significantly different from HEAD ... was that intentional? > > patching file plpgsql.sgml > Hunk #1 succeeded at 2102 (offset -82 lines). > Hunk #3 succeeded at 2167 (offset -82 lines). > Hunk #5 succeeded at 2807 (offset -82 lines). > patching file gram.y > Hunk #1 succeeded at 52 (offset -1 lines). > Hunk #2 succeeded at 141 with fuzz 2 (offset -2 lines). > Hunk #3 succeeded at 1262 (offset -45 lines). > Hunk #4 succeeded at 1314 (offset -2 lines). > Hunk #5 succeeded at 1279 (offset -45 lines). > Hunk #6 succeeded at 1646 (offset -2 lines). > Hunk #7 succeeded at 2703 (offset -144 lines). > patching file pl_comp.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 1750 (offset -1 lines). > patching file pl_exec.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 2270 (offset -97 lines). > patching file pl_funcs.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 1012 (offset -43 lines). > patching file plpgsql.h > Hunk #1 succeeded at 120 (offset -1 lines). > Hunk #2 succeeded at 554 (offset -18 lines). > Hunk #3 succeeded at 808 (offset -1 lines). > patching file plpgsql.out > Hunk #1 FAILED at 3385. > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file plpgsql.out.rej > patching file plpgsql.sql > Hunk #1 FAILED at 2735. > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file plpgsql.sql.rej > > regards, tom lane > -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches