On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 12:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Yeah, this text is a holdover from the original user-definable-modifiers > patch, in which the modifiers indeed had to be numbers. I don't quite > like your suggestion of using "textual", though, because that makes it > sound like the input and output functions are exact inverses, which they > are not. How about "... converts an array of modifier(s) for ..."?
Sounds good to me. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches