On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 12:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, this text is a holdover from the original user-definable-modifiers
> patch, in which the modifiers indeed had to be numbers.  I don't quite
> like your suggestion of using "textual", though, because that makes it
> sound like the input and output functions are exact inverses, which they
> are not.  How about "... converts an array of modifier(s) for ..."?

Sounds good to me.

        Jeff Davis

Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to