Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This proposal strikes me as half-baked. Either we need proper and full
support for variadic functions, or we don't, but I don't think we need
syntactic sugar like the above (or maybe in this case it's really
syntactic saccharine).
What would you consider "proper and full support"?
I don't know. But this doesn't feel like it.
I'm not even sure it's possible to so in any sane way alongside overloading.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
