Bruce Momjian a écrit :
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:

Update patch applied;  I also adjusted some translation function calls.
The new output of psql \d+ is:

        test=> \d+ test
                         Table "public.test"
         Column |  Type   | Modifiers | Storage | Description
        --------+---------+-----------+---------+-------------
         x      | integer |           | plain   |
        Has OIDs: no
Thanks for fixing the header problem.

This patch introduces other strings, "plain", "main" and so on that are
not gettext_noop()ed.  Should we mark those for translation too?  I
admit I am not sure, if only because the untranslated strings are what
gets passed to ALTER TABLE ... SET STORAGE.  But if that's the
decision, then it oughtta be commented in the code ...

I thought about that, but those strings are literal used in our syntax,
so translating them seemed wrong.


I agree on this. If I had to translate these strings, I would copy the english string in the french translation. I don't see an advantage on translating these strings.


--
Guillaume.
 http://www.postgresqlfr.org
 http://dalibo.com

--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches

Reply via email to