On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now, if (-255)::uint1 fails to throw error, that would be a bug IMHO. > Casting any negative value to uint ought to fail, no? >
then the patch is right but it seems to me like that is broking the law of less surprise i expected -2::uint1 to be equivalent to (-2)::uint1 that should be at least documented, no? -- regards, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL AsesorÃa y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. (593) 87171157 -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
