Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> maintenance_work_mem is already used for 3 separate operations that bear
> little resemblance to each other. If it's appropriate for all of those
> then its appropriate for this usage also.

No, it isn't.

The fundamental point here is that this isn't a memory allocation
parameter; it's a switchover threshold between two different behaviors.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to