Johan Fredriksson <es...@kth.se> writes:
> Bad plan: https://explain.depesz.com/s/avtZ
> Good plan: https://explain.depesz.com/s/SJSt
> Any suggestions on how to make the planner make better decisions for
> this query?
Core of the problem looks to be the misestimation here:
Index Only Scan using shredder_cgm1 on public.cachedgroupmembers
cachedgroupmembers_4 (cost=0.43..2.33 rows=79 width=8) (actual
time=0.020..0.903 rows=1492 loops=804)
Output: cachedgroupmembers_4.memberid, cachedgroupmembers_4.groupid,
cachedgroupmembers_4.disabled
Index Cond: ((cachedgroupmembers_4.memberid = principals_1.id) AND
(cachedgroupmembers_4.disabled = 0))
Heap Fetches: 5018
Probably, memberid and disabled are correlated but the planner doesn't
know that, so it thinks the index condition is way more selective than it
actually is. In PG 10, you could very possibly fix that by installing
extended statistics on that pair of columns. See
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/planner-stats.html#PLANNER-STATS-EXTENDED
regards, tom lane
