We had a similar situation recently and saw high commit times that were caused by having unindexed foreign key columns when deleting data with large tables involved. You might check to see if any new foreign key constraints have been added recently or if any foreign key indexes may have inadvertently been removed. Indexing the foreign keys resolved our issue.
Regards, Craig On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 9:19 AM Don Seiler <d...@seiler.us> wrote: > Good morning, > > This week we've noticed that we're starting to see spikes where COMMITs > are taking much longer than usual. Sometimes, quite a few seconds to > finish. After a few minutes they disappear but then return seemingly at > random. This becomes visible to the app and end user as a big stall in > activity. > > The checkpoints are still running for their full 5 min checkpoint_timeout > duration (logs all say "checkpoint starting: time" and I'm not seeing any > warnings about them occurring too frequently. > > This is PostgreSQL 12.4 on Ubuntu 18.04, all running in MS Azure (*not* > managed by them). > > # select version(); > version > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > PostgreSQL 12.4 (Ubuntu 12.4-1.pgdg18.04+1) on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, > compiled by gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0, 64-bit > > I have the stats_temp_directory in a tmpfs mount. I *do* have pg_wal on > the same premium SSD storage volume as the data directory. Normally I would > know to separate these but I was told with the cloud storage that it's all > virtualized anyway, plus storage IOPS are determined by disk size so having > a smaller volume just for pg_wal would hurt me in this case. The kind folks > in the PG community Slack suggested just having one large premium cloud > storage mount for the data directory and leave pg_wal inside because this > virtualization removes any guarantee of true separation. > > I'm wondering if others have experience running self-managed PG in a cloud > setting (especially if in MS Azure) and what they might have seen/done in > cases like this. > > Thanks, > Don. > > -- > Don Seiler > www.seiler.us > -- Craig -- This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, copying, distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and destroy any printed copy of it.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
