Question:

How would one troubleshoot this issue in Postgres as to why the delete was 
running so long?  My background is Oracle and there are various statistics I 
may look at:
•       One could estimate the number of logical reads the delete should do 
based on expected number of rows to delete, expected logical reads against the 
table per row, expected logical reads against each index per row.
•       One could look in V$SQL and see how many logical reads the query was 
actually doing.
•       One could look at V$SESS_IO and see how many logical reads the session 
was doing.

In this case you would see the query was doing way more logical reads that 
expected and then try and think of scenarios that would cause that.

Here is what I could see in Postgres:
•       When I did an explain on the delete I could see it was full scanning 
the table. I did a full scan of the table interactively in less than 1 second 
so the long runtime was not due to the full tablescan.
•       I could not find the query in pg_stat_statements to see how many shared 
block reads/hits the query was doing to see if the numbers were extremely high. 
 Based on documentation queries do not show up in pg_stat_statements until 
after they complete.
•       pg_stat_activity showed wait_event_type and wait_event were null for 
the session every time I looked.  So the session was continually using CPU.

I started looking at table definitions (indexes, FK's, etc.) and comparing to 
Oracle and noticed some indexes missing.  I then could see the table being 
deleted from was a child table with a FK pointing to a parent table.  Finally I 
was able to see that the parent table was missing an index on the FK column so 
for every row being deleted from the child it was full scanning the parent.  
All makes sense after the fact but I'm looking for a more methodical way to 
come to that conclusion by looking at database statistics.

Are there other statistics in Postgres I may have looked at to methodically 
come to the conclusion that the problem was the missing index on the parent FK 
column?

Thanks

This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient and contains 
information that may be privileged and/or confidential. If you are not an 
intended recipient, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this 
e-mail and any attachments. Certain required legal entity disclosures can be 
accessed on our website: 
https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/resources/disclosures.html

Reply via email to